↓ Skip to main content

A RETROSPECTIVE LOOK AT “THE HAYEK STORY”: ROUNDABOUTNESS, STICKY CONSUMPTION, AND SEQUESTERED CAPITAL

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the History of Economic Thought, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 235)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A RETROSPECTIVE LOOK AT “THE HAYEK STORY”: ROUNDABOUTNESS, STICKY CONSUMPTION, AND SEQUESTERED CAPITAL
Published in
Journal of the History of Economic Thought, February 2021
DOI 10.1017/s105383722000005x
Authors

James E. McClure, David Chandler Thomas, Lee C. Spector

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,766,944
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#48
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,261
of 256,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the History of Economic Thought
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 256,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.