↓ Skip to main content

Sobre notas de rodapé: Os percursos da pesquisa nos artigos acadêmicos de História

Overview of attention for article published in Varia Historia, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Sobre notas de rodapé: Os percursos da pesquisa nos artigos acadêmicos de História
Published in
Varia Historia, April 2021
DOI 10.1590/0104-87752021000100001
Authors

Sılvıa LIEBEL

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2021.
All research outputs
#14,469,333
of 18,772,620 outputs
Outputs from Varia Historia
#177
of 311 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,055
of 309,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Varia Historia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,772,620 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 311 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,488 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them