↓ Skip to main content

First-line tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation versus single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, a systematic…

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
First-line tandem high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation versus single high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma, a systematic review of controlled studies
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004626.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Frauke Naumann-Winter, Alexander Greb, Peter Borchmann, Julia Bohlius, Andreas Engert, Roland Schnell

Abstract

Several clinical studies have compared single with tandem (also called double) autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line treatment in patients with symptomatic multiple myeloma (MM), one of the leading indications for ASCT worldwide.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 14%
Unspecified 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 18 24%
Unknown 5 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 57%
Unspecified 10 14%
Psychology 6 8%
Computer Science 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 5 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,554,522
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,594
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,348
of 139,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#62
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.