↓ Skip to main content

Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
213 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgery or embolization for varicoceles in subfertile men
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, October 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000479.pub5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anja CJ Kroese, Natascha M de Lange, John Collins, Johannes LH Evers

Abstract

A varicocele is a meshwork of distended blood vessels in the scrotum, usually left-sided, due to dilatation of the spermatic vein. Although the concept that a varicocele causes male subfertility has been around for more than 50 years now, the mechanisms by which a varicocele would affect fertility have not yet been satisfactorily explained. Neither is there sufficient evidence to explain the mechanisms by which varicocelectomy would restore fertility. Furthermore, it has been questioned whether a causal relation exists at all between the distension of the pampiniform plexus (a network of many small veins found in the human male spermatic cord) and impairment of fertility.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 112 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 14%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 25 22%
Unknown 27 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 40%
Psychology 8 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Social Sciences 6 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 34 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,496,378
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,031
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,412
of 193,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#97
of 224 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 224 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.