↓ Skip to main content

Using High Sample Rate Lidar to Measure Debris-Flow Velocity and Surface Geometry

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using High Sample Rate Lidar to Measure Debris-Flow Velocity and Surface Geometry
Published in
Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, January 2021
DOI 10.2113/eeg-d-20-00045
Authors

Francis K. Rengers, Thomas D. Rapstine, Michael Olsen, Kate E. Allstadt, Richard M. Iverson, Ben Leshchinsky, Maciej Obryk, Joel B. Smith

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Other 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#13,615,073
of 20,437,257 outputs
Outputs from Environmental & Engineering Geoscience
#70
of 89 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,267
of 315,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental & Engineering Geoscience
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,437,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 89 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.