You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
水酸化カルシウム系歯科根管充填材料によって生じた上顎血管塞栓症の1例
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.5794/jjoms.66.565 |
| Authors |
矢島 優己, 藤盛 真樹, 嶋崎 康相, 佐藤 栄晃, 吉田 将亜, 竹川 政範 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 29% |
| Unknown | 12 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,200,505
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#2
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,905
of 517,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them