↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing Twitter to empower scientific engagement and communication: The ISTH 2020 virtual congress experience

Overview of attention for article published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 463)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Harnessing Twitter to empower scientific engagement and communication: The ISTH 2020 virtual congress experience
Published in
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis, March 2021
DOI 10.1002/rth2.12478
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maha Othman, Matthew Cormier, Geoffrey D. Barnes, Shane P. Comer, Jean M. Connors, Frederik Denorme, Alok A. Khorana, Pedro Henrique Las Casas, Shravan Morla, Joshua Muia, Fionnuala Ní Áinle, Kirk A. Taylor, Dianne E. van der Wal, Angela C. Weyand, Michelle Lavin

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 50%
Student > Postgraduate 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Librarian 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2021.
All research outputs
#815,976
of 17,668,039 outputs
Outputs from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#49
of 463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,296
of 305,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,668,039 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.