↓ Skip to main content

心電計の発明者アイントホーフェン医師の共同研究者だった同医師の子息が太平洋戦争下の東京で亡くなっていたことに関する考察

Overview of attention for article published in Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
心電計の発明者アイントホーフェン医師の共同研究者だった同医師の子息が太平洋戦争下の東京で亡くなっていたことに関する考察
Published in
Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology, February 2021
DOI 10.5105/jse.41.30
Authors

Yoshihiko Mochizuki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,955,591
of 25,530,891 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology
#11
of 60 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,363
of 450,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Electrocardiology
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,530,891 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 60 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.