You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A systematic review of potential habitat suitability for the jaguar Panthera onca in central Arizona and New Mexico, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oryx, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s0030605320000459 |
| Authors |
Eric W. Sanderson, Kim Fisher, Rob Peters, Jon P. Beckmann, Bryan Bird, Curtis M. Bradley, Juan Carlos Bravo, Melissa M. Grigione, James R. Hatten, Carlos A. Lopez González, Kurt Menke, Jennifer R. B. Miller, Philip S. Miller, Cristina Mormorunni, Michael J. Robinson, Robert E. Thomas, Sharon Wilcox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 218 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 78 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Mexico | 3 | 1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Burkina Faso | 1 | <1% |
| Georgia | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 4% |
| Unknown | 113 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 178 | 82% |
| Scientists | 25 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 14 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 52 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 33% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 18 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 398. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#77,392
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Oryx
#5
of 2,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,531
of 457,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oryx
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.