↓ Skip to main content

Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts’ recommendations

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Psoriatic arthritis screening: A systematic literature review and experts’ recommendations
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2021
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0248571
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Urruticoechea-Arana, Diego Benavent, Fernando León, Raquel Almodovar, Isabel Belinchón, Pablo de la Cueva, Cristina Fernández-Carballido, Estíbaliz Loza, Jordi Gratacós

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 19%
Researcher 4 13%
Unspecified 3 9%
Professor 2 6%
Student > Master 2 6%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 10 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 38%
Unspecified 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,368,179
of 21,422,252 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,216
of 183,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,271
of 374,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#171
of 423 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,422,252 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 423 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.