↓ Skip to main content

Widespread Increase of Tree Mortality Rates in the Western United States

Overview of attention for article published in Science, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
1194 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1253 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Widespread Increase of Tree Mortality Rates in the Western United States
Published in
Science, January 2009
DOI 10.1126/science.1165000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Phillip J. van Mantgem, Nathan L. Stephenson, John C. Byrne, Lori D. Daniels, Jerry F. Franklin, Peter Z. Fulé, Mark E. Harmon, Andrew J. Larson, Jeremy M. Smith, Alan H. Taylor, Thomas T. Veblen

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,253 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 48 4%
Canada 12 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
United Kingdom 7 <1%
Brazil 5 <1%
Japan 4 <1%
Australia 4 <1%
France 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Other 12 <1%
Unknown 1148 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 314 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 275 22%
Student > Master 199 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 65 5%
Student > Bachelor 64 5%
Other 219 17%
Unknown 117 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 435 35%
Environmental Science 411 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 146 12%
Engineering 22 2%
Social Sciences 20 2%
Other 54 4%
Unknown 165 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 295. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2021.
All research outputs
#77,744
of 20,334,212 outputs
Outputs from Science
#3,012
of 75,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,911
of 371,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#90
of 906 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,334,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,774 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 906 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.