You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, July 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-016-0179-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shunsuke Taito, Nobuaki Shime, Kohei Ota, Hideto Yasuda |
Abstract |
Several recent studies have suggested that the early mobilization of mechanically ventilated patients in the intensive care unit is safe and effective. However, in these studies, few patients reached high levels of active mobilization, and the standard of care among the studies has been inconsistent. The incidence of adverse events during early mobilization is low. Its importance should be considered in the context of the ABCDE bundle. Protocols of early mobilization with strict inclusion and exclusion criteria are needed to further investigate its contributions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 9 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 13% |
Germany | 3 | 7% |
Japan | 2 | 4% |
Sweden | 2 | 4% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Nicaragua | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 11% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 65% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 22% |
Scientists | 4 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 200 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 29 | 14% |
Student > Master | 28 | 14% |
Other | 19 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 7% |
Researcher | 13 | 6% |
Other | 42 | 21% |
Unknown | 55 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 72 | 36% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 22% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 2% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 1% |
Other | 11 | 5% |
Unknown | 62 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,468,916
of 25,292,378 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#73
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,382
of 375,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#6
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,378 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.