You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Chapter title |
Very Rapid and Efficient Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Mouse Pre-B Cells
|
---|---|
Chapter number | 133 |
Book title |
Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS) Cells
|
Published in |
Methods in molecular biology, November 2014
|
DOI | 10.1007/7651_2014_133 |
Pubmed ID | |
Book ISBNs |
978-1-4939-3054-8, 978-1-4939-3055-5
|
Authors |
Bruno Di Stefano, Thomas Graf |
Abstract |
One of the major obstacles in generating induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells suitable for therapeutic application is the low efficiency of the process and the long time required, with many iPS lines acquiring genomic aberrations. In this chapter we describe a highly efficient iPS reprogramming system based on the transient expression in pre-B cells of the transcription factor C/EBPα, followed by the induction of the four Yamanaka factors (OSKM). In addition, the process is very rapid, yielding Oct4 positive cells within 2 days and Nanog-positive iPS cell colonies within a week. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Spain | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 30% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 20% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2014.
All research outputs
#18,385,510
of 22,772,779 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#7,871
of 13,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,860
of 362,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#495
of 1,033 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,772,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,082 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,033 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.