↓ Skip to main content

Reclaiming freshwater sustainability in the Cadillac Desert

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
233 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reclaiming freshwater sustainability in the Cadillac Desert
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, December 2010
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1009734108
Pubmed ID
Authors

John L. Sabo, Tushar Sinha, Laura C. Bowling, Gerrit H. W. Schoups, Wesley W. Wallender, Michael E. Campana, Keith A. Cherkauer, Pam L. Fuller, William L. Graf, Jan W. Hopmans, John S. Kominoski, Carissa Taylor, Stanley W. Trimble, Robert H. Webb, Ellen E. Wohl

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 5%
Brazil 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 215 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 23%
Student > Master 46 20%
Researcher 43 18%
Professor 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 78 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 55 24%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 24 10%
Engineering 17 7%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 32 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,067,098
of 21,770,930 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,386
of 96,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,755
of 375,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#520
of 1,130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,770,930 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96,561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.