↓ Skip to main content

Homogeneous clusters of Alzheimer’s disease patient population

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Homogeneous clusters of Alzheimer’s disease patient population
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, July 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-016-0183-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dragan Gamberger, Bernard Ženko, Alexis Mitelpunkt, Nada Lavrač, The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative

Abstract

Identification of biomarkers for the Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a challenge and a very difficult task both for medical research and data analysis. We applied a novel clustering tool with the goal to identify subpopulations of the AD patients that are homogeneous in respect of available clinical as well as in respect of biological descriptors. The main result is identification of three clusters of patients with significant problems with dementia. The evaluation of properties of these clusters demonstrates that brain atrophy is the main driving force of dementia. The unexpected result is that the largest subpopulation that has very significant problems with dementia has besides mild signs of brain atrophy also large ventricular, intracerebral and whole brain volumes. Due to the fact that ventricular enlargement may be a consequence of brain injuries and that a large majority of patients in this subpopulation are males, a potential hypothesis is that such medical status is a consequence of a combination of previous traumatic events and degenerative processes. The results may have substantial consequences for medical research and clinical trial design. The clustering methodology used in this study may be interesting also for other medical and biological domains.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 47 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 10 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 30%
Computer Science 5 11%
Psychology 5 11%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 13 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,191,741
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#98
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,004
of 355,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,949 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.