RT @npharmston: @PracheeAC theres also this great piece of work ... Reliability of journal impact factor rankings https://t.co/f4fb1LyUVk .…
@PracheeAC theres also this great piece of work ... Reliability of journal impact factor rankings https://t.co/f4fb1LyUVk ... which really shows that no confidence should be placed in using IF to rank journals for libraries / researchers - point estimates
@dhamcres @TheShane73 @guptamvbharat @Reuters Except none of the journals in which these papers are published rank in the top 300 journals for reliability of findings/citations. The highest is at #363. https://t.co/pLKw6N7fKm https://t.co/eZvj8kaBFJ
@andres_baselga @ftmaestre Estamos tomando decisiones vitales basadas en puro ruido estadístico (https://t.co/BDKbGZuhQA). Habrá que vivir con eso, pero no comparto que se le dé apariencia de objetividad estadística. Y luego está la ley de Goodhart, claro,