You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Acupuncture for chronic asthma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd000008.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert W McCarney, Benno Brinkhaus, Toby J Lasserson, Klaus Linde |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 14% |
| Hungary | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Researcher | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 19% |
| Unknown | 63 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 6% |
| Unknown | 64 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2023.
All research outputs
#878,706
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1,701
of 13,156 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#789
of 53,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,156 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,301 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.