↓ Skip to main content

Effects of chronic sleep deprivation on bone mass and bone metabolism in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Effects of chronic sleep deprivation on bone mass and bone metabolism in rats
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13018-016-0418-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaowen Xu, Liang Wang, Liying Chen, Tianjiao Su, Yan Zhang, Tiantian Wang, Weifeng Ma, Fan Yang, Wujie Zhai, Yuanyuan Xie, Dan Li, Qiong Chen, Xuemei Fu, Yuanzheng Ma, Yan Zhang

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the effects of chronic sleep deprivation (CSD) on bone mass and bone metabolism in rats. Twenty-four rats were randomly divided into CSD and control (CON) groups. Rats were subjected to CSD by using the modified multiple platform method (MMPM) to establish an animal model of CSD. Biochemical parameters such as levels of serum N-terminal propeptide of type I procollagen (PINP), N-terminal cross-linking telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), growth hormone (GH), estradiol (E2), serum 25(OH)D, and calcium (Ca) were evaluated at 0, 1, 2, and 3 months. After 3 months, each fourth lumbar vertebra and the distal femoral metaphysis of the left extremity of rats were harvested for micro-computed tomography scans and histological analysis, respectively, after the rats were sacrificed under an overdose of pentobarbital sodium. Compared with rats from the CON group, rats from the CSD group showed significant decreases in bone mineral density (BMD), bone volume over total volume, trabecular bone thickness, and trabecular bone number and significant increases in bone surface area over bone volume and trabecular bone separations (P < 0.05). Bone histomorphology studies showed that rats in the CSD group had decreased osteogenesis, impaired mineralization of newly formed bones, and deteriorative trabecular bone in the secondary spongiosa zone. In addition, they showed significantly decreased levels of serum PINP (1 month later) and NTX (3 months later) (P < 0.05). The serum 25(OH)D level of rats from the CSD group was lower than that of rats from the CON group after 1 month (P < 0.05). CSD markedly affects bone health by decreasing BMD and 25(OH)D, deteriorating the bone microarchitecture, and decreasing bone formation and bone resorption markers.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 28%
Student > Master 9 23%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 9 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 28%
Psychology 5 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 10%
Neuroscience 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 11 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,662,001
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#65
of 1,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,003
of 374,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#2
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,522 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.