↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and Determinants of "String-Pulling" Behaviour in the Croatian Healthcare System

Overview of attention for article published in Drustvena Istrazivanja, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence and Determinants of "String-Pulling" Behaviour in the Croatian Healthcare System
Published in
Drustvena Istrazivanja, March 2021
DOI 10.5559/di.30.1.04
Authors

Josip Franić

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2021.
All research outputs
#11,313,144
of 17,468,018 outputs
Outputs from Drustvena Istrazivanja
#11
of 33 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,424
of 227,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drustvena Istrazivanja
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,468,018 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 33 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.5. This one scored the same or higher as 22 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them