↓ Skip to main content

Plants traditionally used to make brooms in several European countries

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor
pinterest
1 Pinner

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plants traditionally used to make brooms in several European countries
Published in
Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, May 2007
DOI 10.1186/1746-4269-3-20
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anely M Nedelcheva, Yunus Dogan, Paolo Maria Guarrera

Abstract

The research was carried out within the course of two years (2005-2006) in four countries from southern, southeast and eastern parts of Europe: Bulgaria, Italy, Macedonia and Romania. The data are collected mainly from Bulgaria and Italy and are compared with those from Macedonia and Romania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 23%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Professor 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 9 19%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 33%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Environmental Science 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,106,489
of 25,078,088 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#57
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,462
of 83,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,078,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,063 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.