↓ Skip to main content

Retraction: On soft expert topological spaces

Overview of attention for article published in SpringerPlus, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Retraction: On soft expert topological spaces
Published in
SpringerPlus, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/2193-1801-1-42
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabir Hussain, Mohammad Ahmad Alghamdi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Mathematics 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#2,720,662
of 24,457,696 outputs
Outputs from SpringerPlus
#154
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,985
of 187,357 outputs
Outputs of similar age from SpringerPlus
#2
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,457,696 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,357 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.