↓ Skip to main content

American Woodcock Singing-Ground Survey: Comparison of Four Models for Trend in Population Size

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
American Woodcock Singing-Ground Survey: Comparison of Four Models for Trend in Population Size
Published in
Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management, March 2021
DOI 10.3996/jfwm-20-079
Authors

John R. Sauer, William A. Link, Mark E. Seamans, Rebecca D. Rau

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Student > Master 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 50%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2021.
All research outputs
#16,513,460
of 20,535,273 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#135
of 183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,535
of 325,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Fish & Wildlife Management
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,535,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 183 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them