You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Mineral Nutrients and Plant-Fungal Interaction in Cocoa Trees (Theobroma cacao L.)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, January 2021
|
DOI | 10.21577/0103-5053.20200184 |
Authors |
Hélio Sousa Filho, Raildo de Jesus, Marcos Bezerra, Vinnícius da Silva, André da Silva Jr., Juscelia Alves, Gregório Santana, José de Souza Jr. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 15% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 30% |
Chemistry | 3 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,372,533
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#30
of 1,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,567
of 519,474 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,800 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,474 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them