↓ Skip to main content

Dieting practices, weight perceptions, and body composition: A comparison of normal weight, overweight, and obese college females

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
197 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dieting practices, weight perceptions, and body composition: A comparison of normal weight, overweight, and obese college females
Published in
Nutrition Journal, March 2006
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-5-11
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brenda M Malinauskas, Thomas D Raedeke, Victor G Aeby, Jean L Smith, Matthew B Dallas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 197 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 191 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 21%
Student > Bachelor 39 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 6%
Other 45 23%
Unknown 22 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 13%
Social Sciences 23 12%
Psychology 18 9%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 34 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2015.
All research outputs
#1,190,996
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#346
of 1,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,863
of 193,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them