↓ Skip to main content

Axial spondyloarthritis: a new disease entity, not necessarily early ankylosing spondylitis

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Axial spondyloarthritis: a new disease entity, not necessarily early ankylosing spondylitis
Published in
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, October 2012
DOI 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-202073
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philip Cameron Robinson, Bryan Paul Wordsworth, John D Reveille, Matthew A Brown

Abstract

New classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis have been developed with the goal of increasing sensitivity of criteria for early inflammatory spondyloarthritis. However these criteria substantially increase heterogeneity of the resulting disease group, reducing their value in both research and clinical settings. Further research to establish criteria based on better knowledge of the natural history of non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis, its aetiopathogenesis and response to treatment is required. In the meantime the modified New York criteria for ankylosing spondylitis remain a very useful classification criteria set, defining a relatively homogenous group of cases for clinical use and research studies.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 40 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Unspecified 7 16%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 13 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 62%
Unspecified 7 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2013.
All research outputs
#6,273,465
of 12,361,872 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#3,113
of 4,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,754
of 136,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
#32
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,361,872 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,818 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 136,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.