Title |
Is Consent to Autopsy Necessary? Cartesian Dualism in Medicine and Its Limitations
|
---|---|
Published in |
AMA Journal of Ethics, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1001/journalofethics.2016.18.8.ecas2-1608 |
Pubmed ID | |
Abstract |
When a hospitalization ends in death, a request for an autopsy can lead to an emotionally charged encounter between a physician and the deceased patient's family. A case is presented in which a cardiac surgeon, believing he might have made a mistake, requests an autopsy, but members of the deceased patient's family believe that she would not have wanted an autopsy performed. A central question discussed in this commentary is whether and when consent for autopsy is necessary. We discuss two theoretical frameworks that support differing views on this question. Beyond engaging this philosophical discussion, we also highlight a practical approach to discussing an autopsy with a grieving family by using the case presented. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 57% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
Colombia | 1 | 7% |
Canada | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 24% |
Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Unknown | 9 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 55% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 36% |