You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Advice on low‐fat diets for obesity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd003640.pub2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolyn D Summerbell, Cate Cameron, Paul P Glasziou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 25% |
| Brazil | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Zimbabwe | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 40% |
| Scientists | 6 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 24% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,037,777
of 25,639,676 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,737
of 13,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,280
of 96,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,639,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.