↓ Skip to main content

Rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch configurations of runners with symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
169 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rearfoot alignment and medial longitudinal arch configurations of runners with symptoms and histories of plantar fasciitis
Published in
Clinics, January 2011
DOI 10.1590/s1807-59322011000600018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Paula Ribeiro, Francis Trombini-Souza, Vitor Tessutti, Fernanda Rodrigues Lima, Isabel de Camargo Neves Sacco, Silvia Maria Amado João

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 169 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 3 2%
Thailand 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 160 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 23 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 18 11%
Student > Postgraduate 16 9%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 16 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 41%
Sports and Recreations 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 15%
Engineering 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 28 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,848,010
of 17,389,828 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#303
of 532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,322
of 188,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,389,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them