↓ Skip to main content

Low dose versus high dose stavudine for treating people with HIV infection

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low dose versus high dose stavudine for treating people with HIV infection
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007497.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nombulelo Magula, Martin Dedicoat

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 141 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 20%
Researcher 17 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 11%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 27 19%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 52 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Psychology 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 37 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2016.
All research outputs
#3,323,542
of 12,527,219 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,864
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,633
of 262,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#87
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.