↓ Skip to main content

Modeling hypoxia in the central basin of Lake Erie under potential phosphorus load reduction scenarios

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Modeling hypoxia in the central basin of Lake Erie under potential phosphorus load reduction scenarios
Published in
Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.07.001
Authors

Daniel K. Rucinski, Joseph V. DePinto, Dmitry Beletsky, Donald Scavia

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Professor 4 17%
Student > Master 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 33%
Unspecified 3 13%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 8%
Engineering 1 4%
Other 1 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#11,106,373
of 12,489,036 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#765
of 967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,360
of 263,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#21
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,489,036 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.