Modeling hypoxia in the central basin of Lake Erie under potential phosphorus load reduction scenarios
Journal of Great Lakes Research, December 2016
Daniel K. Rucinski, Joseph V. DePinto, Dmitry Beletsky, Donald Scavia
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||5||16%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||3||10%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||8||26%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||3||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
of 22,881,964 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
of 1,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 416,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,881,964 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.