↓ Skip to main content

The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Evolutionary Biology, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 2,942)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
113 news outlets
blogs
8 blogs
twitter
154 X users
facebook
5 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
160 Mendeley
Title
The masculinity paradox: facial masculinity and beardedness interact to determine women's ratings of men's facial attractiveness
Published in
Journal of Evolutionary Biology, August 2016
DOI 10.1111/jeb.12958
Pubmed ID
Authors

B J W Dixson, D Sulikowski, A Gouda-Vossos, M J Rantala, R C Brooks

Abstract

In many species, male secondary sexual traits have evolved via female choice as they confer indirect (i.e. genetic) benefits or direct benefits such as enhanced fertility or survival. In humans, the role of men's characteristically masculine androgen-dependent facial traits in determining men's attractiveness has presented an enduring paradox in studies of human mate preferences. Male-typical facial features such as a pronounced brow ridge, a more robust jawline may signal underlying health while beards may signal men's age and masculine social dominance. However, masculine faces are judged as more attractive for short-term relationships over less masculine faces, while beards are judged as more attractive than clean-shaven faces for long-term relationships. Why such divergent effects occur between preferences for two sexually dimorphic traits remains unresolved. In the present study, we used computer graphic manipulation to morph male faces varying in facial hair from clean-shaven, light stubble, heavy stubble and full beards to appear more (+25% and +50%) or less (-25% and -50%) masculine. Women (N=8520) were assigned to treatments wherein they rated these stimuli for physical attractiveness in general, for a short-term liaison or a long-term relationship. Results showed a significant interaction between beardedness and masculinity on attractiveness ratings. Masculinized and, to an even greater extent, feminized faces were less attractive than unmanipulated faces when all were clean-shaven, and stubble and beards dampened the polarising effects of extreme masculinity and femininity. Relationship context also had effects on ratings, with facial hair enhancing long-term, and not short-term, attractiveness. Effects of facial masculinisation appears to have been due to small differences in the relative attractiveness of each masculinity level under the three treatment conditions and not to any change in the order of their attractiveness. Our findings suggest that beardedness may be attractive when judging long-term relationships as a signal of intra-sexual formidability and the potential to provide direct benefits to females. More generally, our results hint at a divergence of signalling function, which may result in a subtle trade-off in women's preferences, for two highly sexually dimorphic androgen-dependent facial traits. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 157 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 34 21%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 33 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 38 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 8%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 35 22%
Unknown 34 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1064. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#14,932
of 25,816,430 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#2
of 2,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219
of 356,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Evolutionary Biology
#1
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,816,430 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.