↓ Skip to main content

Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have we learnt?:

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
85 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quality and Outcomes Framework: what have we learnt?:
Published in
British Medical Journal, August 2016
DOI 10.1136/bmj.i4060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Martin Roland, Bruce Guthrie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 85 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Unspecified 8 10%
Other 24 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 47%
Unspecified 14 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Other 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 70. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#254,454
of 13,799,368 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#3,631
of 45,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,978
of 264,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#90
of 837 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,799,368 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 837 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.