You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A concept for trial institutions focussing on randomised controlled trials in surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Trials, January 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6215-9-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Nuh N Rahbari, Markus K Diener, Lars Fischer, Moritz N Wente, Peter Kienle, Markus W Büchler, Christoph M Seiler |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 16 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
Researcher | 2 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Professor | 2 | 12% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 65% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2008.
All research outputs
#5,596,665
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#19
of 45 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,138
of 170,816 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 45 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one scored the same or higher as 26 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,816 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them