↓ Skip to main content

Degeneration of the intervertebral disc

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
8 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
980 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
895 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Degeneration of the intervertebral disc
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, March 2003
DOI 10.1186/ar629
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill PG Urban, Sally Roberts

Abstract

The intervertebral disc is a cartilaginous structure that resembles articular cartilage in its biochemistry, but morphologically it is clearly different. It shows degenerative and ageing changes earlier than does any other connective tissue in the body. It is believed to be important clinically because there is an association of disc degeneration with back pain. Current treatments are predominantly conservative or, less commonly, surgical; in many cases there is no clear diagnosis and therapy is considered inadequate. New developments, such as genetic and biological approaches, may allow better diagnosis and treatments in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 895 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 <1%
Canada 4 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Other 6 <1%
Unknown 867 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 140 16%
Student > Master 139 16%
Student > Bachelor 139 16%
Researcher 84 9%
Student > Postgraduate 56 6%
Other 151 17%
Unknown 186 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 231 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 191 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 75 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 51 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 3%
Other 106 12%
Unknown 217 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,319,451
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#420
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,920
of 62,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 62,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them