The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 115 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Scratching the surface: the use of sheepskin parchment to deter textual erasure in early modern legal deeds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Heritage Science, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40494-021-00503-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sean Paul Doherty, Stuart Henderson, Sarah Fiddyment, Jonathan Finch, Matthew J. Collins |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 102 | 89% |
| Scientists | 10 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 29% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1089. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#15,062
of 26,592,204 outputs
Outputs from Heritage Science
#2
of 548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#621
of 460,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heritage Science
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,592,204 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 460,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.