↓ Skip to main content

The antebellum roots of distinctively black names

Overview of attention for article published in Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 126)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
14 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The antebellum roots of distinctively black names
Published in
Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History, March 2021
DOI 10.1080/01615440.2021.1893877
Authors

Lisa D. Cook, John Parman, Trevon Logan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 100%
Student > Master 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 33%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2021.
All research outputs
#492,313
of 17,658,188 outputs
Outputs from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#5
of 126 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,630
of 289,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Historical Methods: A Journal of Quantitative and Interdisciplinary History
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,658,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 126 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them