↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
315 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
429 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2021
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.4682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenico Luca Grieco, Luca S. Menga, Melania Cesarano, Tommaso Rosà, Savino Spadaro, Maria Maddalena Bitondo, Jonathan Montomoli, Giulia Falò, Tommaso Tonetti, Salvatore L. Cutuli, Gabriele Pintaudi, Eloisa S. Tanzarella, Edoardo Piervincenzi, Filippo Bongiovanni, Antonio M. Dell’Anna, Luca Delle Cese, Cecilia Berardi, Simone Carelli, Maria Grazia Bocci, Luca Montini, Giuseppe Bello, Daniele Natalini, Gennaro De Pascale, Matteo Velardo, Carlo Alberto Volta, V. Marco Ranieri, Giorgio Conti, Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Massimo Antonelli, Gian Marco Anzellotti, Laura Cascarano, Francesca Ceccaroni, Paolo De Santis, Mariangela Di Muro, Miriana Durante, Nicoletta Filetici, Veronica Gennenzi, Antonio Gullì, Gianmarco Lombardi, Alessio Maccaglia, Riccardo Maviglia, Alessandro Mele, Giovanna Mercurio, Teresa Michi, Tony C. Morena, Martina Murdolo, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Stefania Postorino, Antonella Potalivo, Francesca Pozzana, Carlotta Rubino, Martina Savino, Roberta Scarascia, Angela Scavone, Donatella Settanni, Serena Silva, Flavia Torrini, Joel Vargas, Carmelina Zaccone

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 764 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 429 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 429 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 11%
Other 43 10%
Student > Bachelor 41 10%
Student > Master 31 7%
Student > Postgraduate 22 5%
Other 62 14%
Unknown 184 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 157 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 1%
Engineering 5 1%
Other 27 6%
Unknown 200 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 443. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2023.
All research outputs
#63,746
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1,207
of 36,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,104
of 454,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#41
of 336 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,605 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 336 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.