↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Helmet Noninvasive Ventilation vs High-Flow Nasal Oxygen on Days Free of Respiratory Support in Patients With COVID-19 and Moderate to Severe Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, May 2021
DOI 10.1001/jama.2021.4682
Pubmed ID
Authors

Domenico Luca Grieco, Luca S. Menga, Melania Cesarano, Tommaso Rosà, Savino Spadaro, Maria Maddalena Bitondo, Jonathan Montomoli, Giulia Falò, Tommaso Tonetti, Salvatore L. Cutuli, Gabriele Pintaudi, Eloisa S. Tanzarella, Edoardo Piervincenzi, Filippo Bongiovanni, Antonio M. Dell’Anna, Luca Delle Cese, Cecilia Berardi, Simone Carelli, Maria Grazia Bocci, Luca Montini, Giuseppe Bello, Daniele Natalini, Gennaro De Pascale, Matteo Velardo, Carlo Alberto Volta, V. Marco Ranieri, Giorgio Conti, Salvatore Maurizio Maggiore, Massimo Antonelli, Gian Marco Anzellotti, Laura Cascarano, Francesca Ceccaroni, Paolo De Santis, Mariangela Di Muro, Miriana Durante, Nicoletta Filetici, Veronica Gennenzi, Antonio Gullì, Gianmarco Lombardi, Alessio Maccaglia, Riccardo Maviglia, Alessandro Mele, Giovanna Mercurio, Teresa Michi, Tony C. Morena, Martina Murdolo, Mariano Alberto Pennisi, Stefania Postorino, Antonella Potalivo, Francesca Pozzana, Carlotta Rubino, Martina Savino, Roberta Scarascia, Angela Scavone, Donatella Settanni, Serena Silva, Flavia Torrini, Joel Vargas, Carmelina Zaccone

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 808 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 18%
Other 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 45 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 468. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2021.
All research outputs
#34,296
of 18,925,350 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#856
of 30,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,367
of 322,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#44
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,925,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.