You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
選択型コンジョイント分析によるフェアトレードバナナの消費者選好分析 -情報提供と支払意思額の関係-
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Food System Research, January 2021
|
| DOI | 10.5874/jfsr.27.4_201 |
| Authors |
岸本 華果, 佐藤 赳, 鈴木 宣弘 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 50% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2021.
All research outputs
#5,194,962
of 25,611,630 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Food System Research
#2
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,515
of 525,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Food System Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,611,630 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one scored the same or higher as 35 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 525,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.