You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing ethical trade‐offs in ecological field studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01755.x |
| Authors |
Kirsten M. Parris, Sarah C. McCall, Michael A. McCarthy, Ben A. Minteer, Katie Steele, Sarah Bekessy, Fabien Medvecky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 191 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 171 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 37 | 19% |
| Unknown | 16 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 106 | 55% |
| Environmental Science | 40 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 20 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2014.
All research outputs
#20,031,982
of 24,618,500 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#3,784
of 3,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,736
of 173,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#11
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,618,500 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.