↓ Skip to main content

Assessing ethical trade-offs in ecological field studies

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing ethical trade-offs in ecological field studies
Published in
Journal of Applied Ecology, February 2010
DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01755.x
Authors

Kirsten M. Parris, Sarah C. McCall, Michael A. McCarthy, Ben A. Minteer, Katie Steele, Sarah Bekessy, Fabien Medvecky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Mexico 2 1%
Australia 2 1%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 137 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 39 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Master 20 13%
Other 13 8%
Other 31 20%
Unknown 5 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 95 60%
Environmental Science 35 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 7 4%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2014.
All research outputs
#10,233,184
of 12,819,049 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#2,273
of 2,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,380
of 144,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#53
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,819,049 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,401 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,482 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.