↓ Skip to main content

Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Controlled ovarian stimulation should not be preferred for male infertility treated with intrauterine insemination: a retrospective study
Published in
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, March 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12958-021-00730-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Tang, Qian-Dong He, Ting-Ting Zhang, Jing-Jing Wang, Si-Chong Huang, Yun Ye

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Unspecified 1 7%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Student > Master 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 27%
Unspecified 1 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 7%
Engineering 1 7%
Unknown 8 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,801,532
of 23,301,510 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#682
of 1,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,698
of 426,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
#20
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,301,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,002 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.