↓ Skip to main content

1.動物と経皮感作型食物アレルギー

Overview of attention for article published in Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
1.動物と経皮感作型食物アレルギー
Published in
Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology, March 2021
DOI 10.14924/dermatol.131.491
Authors

猪又 直子

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,791,976
of 17,575,102 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#12
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,299
of 250,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Hifuka Gakkai zasshi The Japanese journal of dermatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,575,102 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them