You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers — Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020–March 2021
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark G. Thompson, Jefferey L. Burgess, Allison L. Naleway, Harmony L. Tyner, Sarang K. Yoon, Jennifer Meece, Lauren E.W. Olsho, Alberto J. Caban-Martinez, Ashley Fowlkes, Karen Lutrick, Jennifer L. Kuntz, Kayan Dunnigan, Marilyn J. Odean, Kurt T. Hegmann, Elisha Stefanski, Laura J. Edwards, Natasha Schaefer-Solle, Lauren Grant, Katherine Ellingson, Holly C. Groom, Tnelda Zunie, Matthew S. Thiese, Lynn Ivacic, Meredith G. Wesley, Julie Mayo Lamberte, Xiaoxiao Sun, Michael E. Smith, Andrew L. Phillips, Kimberly D. Groover, Young M. Yoo, Joe Gerald, Rachel T. Brown, Meghan K. Herring, Gregory Joseph, Shawn Beitel, Tyler C. Morrill, Josephine Mak, Patrick Rivers, Katherine M. Harris, Danielle R. Hunt, Melissa L. Arvay, Preeta Kutty, Alicia M. Fry, Manjusha Gaglani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11,036 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2596 | 24% |
| Japan | 631 | 6% |
| Canada | 228 | 2% |
| Spain | 205 | 2% |
| France | 166 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 138 | 1% |
| Norway | 129 | 1% |
| Italy | 98 | <1% |
| Argentina | 94 | <1% |
| Other | 1308 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5443 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9614 | 87% |
| Scientists | 667 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 487 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 266 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 636 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 636 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 80 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 67 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 6% |
| Other | 35 | 6% |
| Other | 104 | 16% |
| Unknown | 268 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 46 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 4% |
| Other | 94 | 15% |
| Unknown | 299 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11095. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#139
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#11
of 4,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10
of 457,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#2
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 338.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 457,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.