↓ Skip to main content

Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and…

Overview of attention for article published in MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 3,088)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interim Estimates of Vaccine Effectiveness of BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 COVID-19 Vaccines in Preventing SARS-CoV-2 Infection Among Health Care Personnel, First Responders, and Other Essential and Frontline Workers — Eight U.S. Locations, December 2020–March 2021
Published in
MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report, April 2021
DOI 10.15585/mmwr.mm7013e3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark G. Thompson, Jefferey L. Burgess, Allison L. Naleway, Harmony L. Tyner, Sarang K. Yoon, Jennifer Meece, Lauren E.W. Olsho, Alberto J. Caban-Martinez, Ashley Fowlkes, Karen Lutrick, Jennifer L. Kuntz, Kayan Dunnigan, Marilyn J. Odean, Kurt T. Hegmann, Elisha Stefanski, Laura J. Edwards, Natasha Schaefer-Solle, Lauren Grant, Katherine Ellingson, Holly C. Groom, Tnelda Zunie, Matthew S. Thiese, Lynn Ivacic, Meredith G. Wesley, Julie Mayo Lamberte, Xiaoxiao Sun, Michael E. Smith, Andrew L. Phillips, Kimberly D. Groover, Young M. Yoo, Joe Gerald, Rachel T. Brown, Meghan K. Herring, Gregory Joseph, Shawn Beitel, Tyler C. Morrill, Josephine Mak, Patrick Rivers, Katherine M. Harris, Danielle R. Hunt, Melissa L. Arvay, Preeta Kutty, Alicia M. Fry, Manjusha Gaglani

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10,957 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 140 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 23%
Student > Bachelor 16 11%
Other 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Student > Master 8 6%
Other 34 24%
Unknown 28 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Unspecified 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Other 32 23%
Unknown 38 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10294. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2021.
All research outputs
#87
of 17,638,294 outputs
Outputs from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#8
of 3,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6
of 274,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age from MMWR: Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,638,294 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,088 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 228.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,374 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.