↓ Skip to main content

Chinese medical herbs for chemotherapy side effects in colorectal cancer patients

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
120 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese medical herbs for chemotherapy side effects in colorectal cancer patients
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2005
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004540.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Taixiang Wu, Alastair J Munro, Liu Guanjian, Guan Jian Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 17%
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 10%
Other 14 7%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 54 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 17 9%
Unknown 56 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#3,075,212
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,696
of 11,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,023
of 158,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.