↓ Skip to main content

A Harder and Longer Process? Dispelling Myths about Women in Judicial Primary Elections

Overview of attention for article published in Justice System Journal, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Harder and Longer Process? Dispelling Myths about Women in Judicial Primary Elections
Published in
Justice System Journal, March 2021
DOI 10.1080/0098261x.2021.1902438
Authors

Kate Eugenis

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 67%
Unspecified 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2021.
All research outputs
#18,294,877
of 20,618,952 outputs
Outputs from Justice System Journal
#81
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,904
of 328,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Justice System Journal
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,618,952 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,618 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.