↓ Skip to main content

Is Conceptual Engineering from Japan Feasible?: A Review of Conceptual Engineering Manifesto edited by Kasuhisa Todayama and Kaori Karasawa

Overview of attention for article published in Kagaku tetsugaku, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 173)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Is Conceptual Engineering from Japan Feasible?: A Review of Conceptual Engineering Manifesto edited by Kasuhisa Todayama and Kaori Karasawa
Published in
Kagaku tetsugaku, March 2021
DOI 10.4216/jpssj.53.2_259
Authors

Ryo Uehara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,157,188
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Kagaku tetsugaku
#14
of 173 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,952
of 454,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kagaku tetsugaku
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 173 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.