You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inter-rater reliability of three standardized functional tests in patients with low back pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-10-58 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johan Tidstrand, Eva Horneij |
| Abstract |
Of all patients with low back pain, 85% are diagnosed as "non-specific lumbar pain". Lumbar instability has been described as one specific diagnosis which several authors have described as delayed muscular responses, impaired postural control as well as impaired muscular coordination among these patients. This has mostly been measured and evaluated in a laboratory setting. There are few standardized and evaluated functional tests, examining functional muscular coordination which are also applicable in the non-laboratory setting. In ordinary clinical work, tests of functional muscular coordination should be easy to apply. The aim of this present study was to therefore standardize and examine the inter-rater reliability of three functional tests of muscular functional coordination of the lumbar spine in patients with low back pain. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 56 | 27% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 11% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 90 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 14% |
| Sports and Recreations | 18 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2022.
All research outputs
#3,651,318
of 23,041,514 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#716
of 4,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,280
of 114,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,041,514 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,098 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.