↓ Skip to main content

What money can’t buy: an argument against paying people to get vaccinated

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Ethics, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#17 of 3,419)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
60 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
12 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What money can’t buy: an argument against paying people to get vaccinated
Published in
Journal of Medical Ethics, April 2021
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2021-107235
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nancy S Jecker

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 21 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Social Sciences 4 9%
Psychology 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 24 52%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 496. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2023.
All research outputs
#42,836
of 22,912,409 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Ethics
#17
of 3,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,559
of 429,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Ethics
#3
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,912,409 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,419 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,298 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.