↓ Skip to main content

Distinct weekly cycles of thunderstorms and a potential connection with aerosol type in China

Overview of attention for article published in Geophysical Research Letters, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
69 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Distinct weekly cycles of thunderstorms and a potential connection with aerosol type in China
Published in
Geophysical Research Letters, August 2016
DOI 10.1002/2016gl070375
Authors

Xin Yang, Zhanqing Li, Lin Liu, Lijing Zhou, Maureen Cribb, Fang Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 69 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Postgraduate 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Unknown 5 56%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 3 33%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 11%
Engineering 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2018.
All research outputs
#465,600
of 25,630,321 outputs
Outputs from Geophysical Research Letters
#1,071
of 21,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,992
of 352,148 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geophysical Research Letters
#30
of 365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,630,321 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,148 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.