↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of a TIA/stroke electronic support tool (FASTEST) trial: Study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of a TIA/stroke electronic support tool (FASTEST) trial: Study protocol
Published in
Implementation Science, October 2012
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-7-107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annemarei Ranta, Susan Dovey, Mark Weatherall, Dea O’Dea

Abstract

Strokes are a common cause of adult disability and mortality worldwide. Transient ischaemic attacks (TIA) are associated with a high risk of subsequent stroke, and rapid intervention has the potential to reduce stroke burden. This study will assess a novel electronic decision support (EDS) tool to allow general practitioners (GPs) to implement evidence-based care rapidly without full reliance on specialists.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Pakistan 1 1%
Unknown 85 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 20%
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 10%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Computer Science 4 5%
Social Sciences 4 5%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,487
of 1,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,940
of 202,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#21
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,809 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.