↓ Skip to main content

Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management

Overview of attention for article published in Conservation Physiology, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exploiting common senses: sensory ecology meets wildlife conservation and management
Published in
Conservation Physiology, March 2021
DOI 10.1093/conphys/coab002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura K Elmer, Christine L Madliger, Daniel T Blumstein, Chris K Elvidge, Esteban Fernández-Juricic, Andrij Z Horodysky, Nicholas S Johnson, Liam P McGuire, Ronald R Swaisgood, Steven J Cooke

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 14%
Researcher 8 12%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 28 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 35%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 29 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,504,215
of 26,705,860 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Physiology
#439
of 847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,337
of 461,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Physiology
#12
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,705,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.